Home » Groups » DFA Night School » Blog » Fresno, CA -- "We say, Bailout...
Democracy for America group blog for DFA Night School
Fresno, CA -- "We say, Bailout Main Street NOT Wall Street"
Linked to groups: DFA-CFD of Fresno & Madera Counties, Democratic Club of Coarsegold, California for Democracy, DFA Blog Network, blog for America Test and Poll Group, Blog For America
SunMt videographer Elfie Ballis reported on our local "STOP The Bush Bailout" emergency coalition rally that was held on Peace corner (Shaw & Blackstone) in Fresno, California.
(PHOTO by Susan Rowe)


The real problem seems to me the conservative values, principles, ideology and policies that dominate the country. This is the conservative;
- values of greed, corruption, selfishness, authoritarianism, secrecy, etc,
- the principles of 'free market' (cough, cough, cough), small government (cough, cough, cough), large military, 'traditional' values (cough, cough, cough),
- and the policies that flow from that.
McBush is only a manifestation of this. The problem to me is the whole conservative movement and we need a total new set of values and principles to base the spirit of the country on. To get there, I think we need to attack conservativism; it's values, principles, ideology and polices (especially their values). Then offer an alternative set of progressive values, principles, ideology and polices.
I've been trying to develop the attack at conservative values and principles, but I don't know if I'm getting anywhere with it.
Vice presidential debates with George LakoffThe vice presidential debates with a discussion afterwards by Lakoff (The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21<sup style="line-height: 1.22em;">st</sup> Century Politics with an 18<sup style="line-height: 1.22em;">th</sup> Century Brain) and Susan Griffin (Wrestling with the Angel of Democracy: On Being an American Citizen) will be held at the Albany library Thursday Oct. 2 at 6 p.m.Lakoff may have a prepared presentation of progressive and conservative communication styles but will surely discuss the debateFreelight refreshmentsAlbany library is 1247 Marin Ave.Edith Stone Room510-526-3720Hope to see you there,Darcy Crosman
Yesterday, the Bush administration and congressional leaders "said they had struck an accord," agreeing to spend "up to $700 billion to relieve Wall Street of troubled assets backed by faltering home mortgages." The bailout legislation, titled the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, was discussed by both congressional chambers throughout the weekend, and is expected to come to the House floor for a vote today. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said that the Senate will vote on the bill by Oct. 1. The final legislation, which President Bush praised as a "very good bill," is necessary to prevent a wider financial meltdown that would cause more job losses. Also, the bill charges the Treasury Department with attempting "to prevent avoidable foreclosures." That said, the legislation still falls short, and does not give adequate coverage to taxpayers and homeowners struggling to stay in their homes.
haven't been around lately.
the bailout is a mess. my bank wachovia just went under. after they called me two weeks ago telling me all was well.
friggen wachovia.
my god.
take the money and run.
- Left, Right Continue Assault On Bailout; McCain Warned Against Supporting Plan
By Susan Rowe on Sep 29, 2008 1:20 PM EDTthat our government protect the taxpayers from the greed and arrogance of Wall
St. bankers. Please contact your members of Congress and tell them to vote "NO"
on the Wall St. bailout if it does not include benefits for Main St.,
too.
- DAVID SIROTA: Top 5 Reasons to Vote Against Wall Street's $700 Billion Bailout
By Susan Rowe on Sep 29, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
DAVID SIROTA
Top 5 Reasons to Vote Against Wall Street's $700 Billion BailoutThere's news of a congressional deal to bailout Wall Street fat cats with $700 billion of taxpayer cash. Though it is better than what Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson originally proposed, it remains an insulting atrocity, having omitted even basic aid to homeowners, bankruptcy reforms and any modicum of future financial industry regulation. Now, The New York Times reports that the Democratic leadership may not have the votes to pass this bailout. So without further ado, here are the top 5 reasons should vote against this bailout deal.
House defeats $700 bailout plan
The House has defeated the $700 billion bailout legislation for the financial industry. Read More
I do not know how this blog works--where is the "main thread" ? In terms of bail out, wow, I want to discuss--where is everyone. been a long time since I was around so i am confussed.
You guys did a great job. Keep it up!!
BY David SirotaI'm scheduled to appear on CNN at 3:30pm EST to discuss the House's extraordinary vote just moments ago to reject the $700 billion Wall Street bailout. What I'm going to say is pretty simple: the Left-Right make up of the "no" vote in Congress proves that Washington is facing a full on transpartisan revolt - the very revolt that I predicted in my book, The Uprising. No longer is this a populist revolt merely scaring Wall Street and Washington - this is a populist revolt that has, to quote Markos, crashed the gate, and it represents a real victory for the progressive movement and voices who said Hell No. For once - and hopefully not for only a fleeting moment - democracy made an appearance in the halls of power.
So you all won a moral 'victory.' Great. But, what next? Are you going to demand to turn back the evils of this administration all in one bill?
The immediate crisis is the freeze in credit. In several days, you will start to see Main Street fail as businesses' lines of credit fail, they miss payroll, and cannot pay for shipments or loans.
As unpaid workers are squeezed, consumer spending will contract, further damaging Main Street. If bickering over ideology extends into weeks, layoffs will begin to occur. Just as we run up to the holiday buying season, consumer spending will contract further as people hunker down.
The longer the freeze in credit lasts, the more banks will fail, and the farther the stock market will fall. Depositors and investors will cut back spending as they watch their life savings disappear before their eyes.
This is what an economic depression looks like, and it is happening right now, right before your eyes. There is no time to waste.
- Denise, The protest was against Bush's plan before the latest congressional bill was even written.
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 12:41 PM EDTBush wanted a blank check and no oversite. The Republicans are the ones responsible for that the bill's failure yesterday.
How they voted: California roll call vote on the bailout plan
Here's a good link to the roll call vote by which the bailout bill failed in the House today. Here's how the California delegation voted (29 in favor, 24 opposed); the breakdown by party is as follows: Among Democrats, 19 voted for the bailout, 15 against; Among Republicans, 10 voted for the bailout, nine against.
Republicans voting yes:
Wally Herger (Chico)
Dan Lungren (Gold River)
George Radanovich (Mariposa)
Howard "Buck" McKeon (Santa Clarita)
David Dreier (San Dimas)
Jerry Lewis (Redlands)
Gary Miller (Diamond Bar)
Ken Calvert (Corona)
Mary Bono Mack (Palm Springs)
John Campbell (Irvine)Republicans voting no:
John Doolittle (Roseville)
David Nunes (Tulare)
Kevin McCarthy (Bakersfield)
Elton Gallegly (Simi Valley)
Ed Royce (Fullerton)
Dana Rohrabacher (Huntington Beach)
Darrell Issa (Vista)
Brian Bilbray (Carlsbad)
Duncan Hunter (Alpine)Democrats voting yes:
Doris Matsui (Sacramento)
George Miller (Martinez)
Nancy Pelosi (San Francisco)
Ellen Tauscher (Alamo)
Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton)
Jackie Speier (Hillsborough)
Anna Eshoo (Menlo Park)
Mike Honda (San Jose)
Zoe Lofgren (San Jose)
Sam Farr (Carmel)
Dennis Cardoza (Atwater)
Jim Costa (Fresno)
Lois Capps (Santa Barbara)
Howard Berman (Valley Village)
Henry Waxman (Beverly Hills)
Maxine Waters (Los Angeles)
Jane Harman (Venice)
Laura Richardson (Long Beach)
Susan Davis (San Diego)Democrats voting no:
Mike Thompson (St. Helena)
Lynn Woolsey (Petaluma)
Barbara Lee (Oakland)
Pete Stark (Fremont)
Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks)
Adam Schiff (Burbank)
Xavier Becerra (Los Angeles)
Hilda Solis (El Monte)
Diane Watson (Los Angeles)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (East Los Angeles)
Grace Napolitano (Norwalk)
Linda Sanchez (Lakewood)
Joe Baca (Rialto)
Loretta Sanchez (Garden Grove)
Bob Filner (Chula Vista)
- Did Gingrich Give Marching Orders To House GOP To Vote Against Bailout?
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 8:18 PM EDTDid Gingrich Give Marching Orders To House GOP To Vote Against Bailout?
Now that House Republicans are insisting their vote against the bailout yesterday had nothing to do with Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s supposedly “partisan” speech, some are wondering what in fact turned at least 10 Republican votes Blunt thought he had against the bill.
NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reported this morning that conservatives may have been taking their marching orders from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who “was whipping against this up until the last minute” — despite issuing a statement supporting the bill as the vote was taking place:
Watch it: HERE
Just to let you know. I was a commercial banker for over 11 years. And I do own stock. The Bush adminstration's bailout proposal was immoral and unethical. And congress was ready to write Bush's Wall Street backers another blank check. If that were to happen the American people can kiss Obama's universal healthcare plans good bye.
The Bailout and What's Next
Dear Friends,
Yesterday marked a day that will go down in history, when Congressional Democrats and Republicans alike took on full responsibility to protect the interests of taxpaying Americans, and defeated the deceptive bail out bill, defying the dictates of the Administration, the House Majority Leadership, the House Minority Leadership and the special interests on Wall Street.
Obviously Congress must consider quickly another course. There are immediate issues which demand attention and responsible action by the Congress so that the taxpayers, their assets, and their futures are protected.
We MUST do something to protect millions of Americans whose homes, bank deposits, investments, and pensions are at risk in a financial system that has become seriously corrupted. We are told that we must stabilize markets in order for the people to be protected. I think we need to protect peoples' homes, bank deposits, investments, and pensions, to order to stabilize the market.
We cannot delay taking action. But the action must benefit all Americans, not just a privileged few. Otherwise, more plans will fail, and the financial security of everyone will be at risk.
The $700 billion bailout would have added to our existing unbearable load of national debt, trade deficits, and the cost of paying for the war. It would have been a disaster for the American public and the government for decades and maybe even centuries to come.
To be sure, there are many different reasons why people voted against the bailout. The legislation did not regard in any meaningful way the plight of millions of Americans who are about to lose their homes. It did nothing to strengthen existing regulatory structures or impose new ones at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve in order to protect investors. There were no direct protections for bank depositors. There was nothing to stop further speculation, which is what brought us into this mess in the first place.
This was a bailout for some firms (and investors) on Wall Street, with the idea that in doing so there would be certain, unspecified, general benefits to the economy.
This is a perfect time to open a broader discussion about our financial system, especially our monetary system. Such a discussion is like searching for a needle in a haystack, and then, upon finding it, discussing its qualities at great length. Let me briefly describe the haystack instead.
Here is a very quick explanation of the $700 billion bailout within the context of the mechanics of our monetary and banking system:
The taxpayers loan money to the banks. But the taxpayers do not have the money. So we have to borrow it from the banks to give it back to the banks. But the banks do not have the money to loan to the government. So they create it into existence (through a mechanism called fractional reserve) and then loan it to us, at interest, so we can then give it back to them.
Confused?
This is the system. This is the standard mechanism used to expand the money supply on a daily basis not a special one designed only for the "$700 billion" transaction. People will explain this to you in many different ways, but this is what it comes down to.
The banks needed Congress' approval. Of course in this topsy turvy world, it is the banks which set the terms of the money they are borrowing from the taxpayers. And what do we get for this transaction? Long term debt enslavement of our country. We get to pay back to the banks trillions of dollars ($700 billion with compounded interest) and the banks give us their bad debt which they cull from everywhere in the world.
Who could turn down a deal like this? I did.
The globalization of the debt puts the United States in the position that in order to repay the money that we borrow from the banks (for the banks) we could be forced to accept International Monetary Fund dictates which involve cutting health, social security benefits and all other social spending in addition to reducing wages and exploiting our natural resources. This inevitably leads to a loss of economic, social and political freedom.
Under the failed $700 billion bailout plan, Wall Street's profits are Wall Street's profits and Wall Street's losses are the taxpayers' losses. Profits are capitalized. Losses are socialized.
We are at a teachable moment on matters of money and finance. In the coming days and weeks, I will share with you thoughts about what can be done to take us not just in a new direction, but in a new direction which is just.
Thank you,
Dennis
www.Kucinich.us
216-252-9000 877-933-6647
PS Watch the 47 minute 'Money as Debt' animated documentary in http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279. This is a useful, though by no means definitive, introduction to the topic of debt and the monetary system. Let me know what you think.
- Our local protest helped to flip our Republican's congressman's vote to yes. Radanovich has no opponent in this election.
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 1:05 PM EDTRep. George Radanovich, R-Mariposa, voted against the $700 billion bailout bill before he voted for it.Radanovich's mid-stream switch was not enough to change the outcome of the closely watched vote, which more than one House member called "historic" today. Radanovich's flip, though, did suggest the kind of roiling political cross-currents that left the San Joaquin Valley congressional delegation sharply divided.
"This is a bill that no one wanted to vote for," Radanovich said afterward. "I would have loved to vote against it, but in the end we couldn't afford not to do something."
[...]
Radanovich's switch occurred during a tumultuous period on the House floor, after the standard 17-minute voting period had expired and congressional leaders from both sides were furiously trying to find last-minute converts. Several GOP members, who were opposed to the bill, described the one-on-one lobbying as extraordinarily intense.
- Personally I did not want Bush's bailout proposal at all.
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 4:50 PM EDTAnd I thought that congressional bill was just awful. What is interesting is that Radanovich changed his vote. He never does that. He always votes with the ultra right-wingers.
IMHO, congress should have left for an early holiday vacation.
- "All politics is local " --Tip O'Neill (Former Speaker of the House)
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 1:51 PM EDTToday, the Obama-Biden campaign released a new two minute TV ad, Same Path, which includes Senator Obama telling America he knows we can steer ourselves out of this crisis, but not by driving down the very same path and how that’s what this election’s all about.
In the ad, Obama details how his plan to jump-start our economy, create millions of jobs, and bring back our Main Streets all across America differs with John McCain’s plan to continue the same failed policies. Obama specifically lays out how his tax plan which offers three times as much tax relief to the middle class and cuts taxes for small and startup businesses differs from McCain’s which will continue giving hundreds of billions in new tax breaks to big corporations and oil companies and extends the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest.
- Robert Borosage, Campaign for America's Future: Fight Back for Main Street!
By Susan Rowe on Sep 30, 2008 6:03 PM EDTHistory was made yesterday. The American people demanded an economic bailout strategy that helped Main Street as well as Wall Street. When congressional leaders came up short, fierce public pressure forced the House to vote "No."
But, with the financial crisis deepening, saying "no" is not enough. It’s time to act.
Tremendous pressure is already mounting from the White House and Wall Street to exploit people's anxiety, dress up the same weak bill and ram it through this week! Congress needs to hear from you NOW, to resist this pressure and take a stand to rebuild Main Street and reign in Wall Street.
Tell Congress: Resist Wall Street. Stand up for Main Street. Deliver a new "New Deal."
The defeated bailout package promised more failed trickle-down logic -- bailout the financiers at the top and prosperity would trickle-down. To get the economy back on track, we need a new "New Deal" that rebuilds the economy from the bottom up.
Invest In Main Street: On Main Street, jobs are disappearing, infrastructure is crumbling and local budgets are straining. A $200 billion economic rescue package for Main Street would generate clean American energy, extend unemployment benefits, aid states and localities to avoid debilitating cuts and modernize our crumbling infrastructure.
Save The Homeowners: Defaulting mortgages are at the heart of the crisis. Keeping deserving people in their homes is critical to shore up Main Street and Wall Street. The bankruptcy courts need to have the power to renegotiate mortgages and reduce foreclosures.
Hold Wall Street Accountable: Instead of simply propping up reckless firms, we should establish a Reconstruction Finance Corporation that can take over financial firms, sort out the solvent from the insolvent, close down some and merge others. We also need modern regulation that cracks down on the abuse. And taxpayers deserve preferred shares in any bank or investment house that we are forced to rescue.
This sort of new "New Deal" economic rescue plan puts Main St. first. It's what Congress should have done from the start. Tell Congress now: Resist Wall Street. Stand up for Main Street. Deliver a new "New Deal."
Make no mistake, the financial crisis is serious and severe. Big problems require bold solutions. And problems caused by conservative policies need progressive answers.
Conservatives are regrouping now. They'll try to put progressives on their heels, and pander to Wall Street with more deregulation and top end tax cuts -- the same conservative policies that derailed the economy and ravaged the markets in the first place.
You beat back Wall Street once, but their pressure will not let up. Congress needs to hear your voice again NOW to build on this stunning victory. Your voice already stopped a bad bill, now it can pass a good one.
Tell Congress: Resist Wall Street. Stand up for Main Street. Deliver a new "New Deal."
Sincerely,
Robert L. Borosage, Co-Director
Campaign for America’s Future
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)Post closed to commenting
| My DFA | |
| Members | |
| Groups | |
| Events | |
| Candidates | |
![]() |
|
Blog for America
-
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST -
Death at Wal-Mart--True Meaning of the Holidays
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 29, 2008 8:00 AM EST -
My better nature coming through
By Jack Bucci on Nov 26, 2008 10:21 AM EST -
Action Alerts
By Kenneth Quinnell on Nov 23, 2008 2:20 PM EST -
The Cheney Legacy:
By Jeff Morris-Saugerties, N.Y.- De on Nov 22, 2008 1:40 AM EST
Recent Blog Posts
-
A NEW CONVERTED DEMOCRAT WHO SUPPORTS OBAMA!!
By STEVEN B on Dec 2, 2008 7:27 PM EST -
Tuesday articles
By Gerry L on Dec 2, 2008 8:06 AM EST -
On Traffic Checkpoints, Part One, Or, Freedom? That's So...Inefficient
By fake consultant on Dec 1, 2008 9:44 PM EST -
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST -
Wal-Mart danger a DANGER ZONE
By Gloria L on Dec 1, 2008 1:45 PM EST






- nice picture of you susan!
By Edwin Rutsch on Sep 28, 2008 10:40 PM EDTway to go.