Home » Users » John Burik » Blog » Why I STILL cannot support...

Democracy for America personal blog for John Burik

Why I STILL cannot support Holt (HR 811)

Written by: John Burik on May 17, 2007 9:58 PM EDT

While the intent of Rush Holt's HR 811 was a step toward restoring our election process, the reality is quite another matter.  Worse, the substitute bill introduced about a week ago permits software companies to demand nondisclosure agreements from election officials. Thus Holt backed down from one of the most important features of the legislation. SECRET SOFTWARE means secret vote counting, and that erases any hope that 2008 will be an improvement on 2000 or 2004.

The bill permits the continued existence of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), the continued use of touch screen voting machines, and funds machines which do not yet (and may not ever) exist.  In a few states that do not currently require a "paper trail" the bill may provide some benefit, for example, the Christine Jennings race in Florida.  This one small step forward is by far outweighed by secret software, DREs, and the White House appointed EAC.

Whether you support Hand Counted Paper Ballots or some use of electronic voting, the secret vote counting permitted by Holt is anathema to democracy.  i urge you to oppose HR 811. 

Tags:

Discuss
 

Reply

157t206129

-

By David Reiter on May 18, 2007 2:21 PM EDT

There is definitely some things within HR 811 we can do without, but it is still an improvement on the system we have now.  It does require an auditable paper trail, which is not currently federally mandated.  It relies on the NIST for information about vote accuracy and integrity, and the EAC is just s facillitating organization, not an elections cop.  The bill also looks forward to a time where auditable paper ballots are universal, which is existing technology that just has to be applied...this is what it is funding.

We should support HR811 and urge Holt to make changes we think are necessary because we will not get the paper ballot on the table again in Congress...so we have to make what we have better.  Write and call Congressman Holt and ask him to make changes you think are necessary... but lets not toss the baby out with the bathwater.  Keep in mind that it seems that it is this bill or no bill...so lets work toward something rather than nothing.

T164648

-

By John Burik on May 27, 2007 9:52 AM EDT

Unfortunately, David, your statement, "EAC is just [a] facillitating organization" is inaccurate. When the report on fraud commissioned by the EAC found voter fraud to be a myth, the EAC changed the report.

Many support the "beats a blank" argument you put forward.  I do not.  HAVA--which the Holt bill amends--was similarly thought to be an improvement over the Florida 2000 debacle. In fact, it made the situation worse.  The use of provisional ballots was huge in 2004, but rather than ensuring citizens' right to vote they had the effect of disenfranchising voters.  Roughly 200,000 voters were made to vote provisionally in Ohio 2004.  Twenty-two percent were rejected.

Finally, many, many of us who are actively on the ground have been trying to talk with Rep. Holt or his aide Michelle Mulder about HR 811 since the days it was HR 550. We get transferred to voice mail with no calls returned.

Sure the situation in GA, NC or MD and a couple other states may improve somewhat with a paper trail.  On the whole, however, HR 811 is a move away from real election reform.   

Add your comment

(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)

Post closed to commenting
star My DFA
star Members
star Groups
star Events
star Candidates

DFA Wireless

Blog for America

Recent Blog Posts

The Watercooler