Home » Users » Jessica Falker » Blog » Seeking Entertainers For DemocracyFest...
Democracy for America personal blog for Jessica Falker
Seeking Entertainers For DemocracyFest!
The 5th Annual DemocracyFest will be held on August 16-17, 2008 in Dulles, VA, just outside Washington, DC.
DemocracyFest is currently seeking performing artists for the "Celebration by Night" portion of the event. This includes daytime interludes between guest speakers and the Bloggers' Breakfast. Musicians, poets, comedians and other creative forms of entertainment are welcome.
Whether you've performed at a DemocracyFest in the past - or a performing artist who would like to join us for the first time - we'd love to hear from you about volunteering your talent.
Local artists are especially encouraged to contact us about performing. DemocracyFest seeks to spotlight talent from the local area in order to increase their visibility for the area's political events in the future and provide local flavor for DemocracyFest attendees from around the country.
We'll do our best to give all performers maximum exposure possible. If you have any recorded CD's or DVD's, we will arrange to have your merchandise available to attendees throughout the weekend, without commission.
Please contact us at info@democracyfest.net about performing at the 5th Annual DemocracyFest!
Don't have a special talent? That's OK! Come enjoy the performances, as well as political trainings and inspirational speakers throughout the weekend, and socialize with hundreds of like-minded activists at this fun-filled and educational weekend festival! Tickets are available at http://www.democracyfest.net/
Hope to see you all there!
David, Ellen, Jessica, Laurie and Quintus
Show: Expand All Reply
- Deans and DemocracyFest are first ;-)
By Thankful2Thankful4Dean on Jun 20, 2008 3:50 AM EDTHey sea, how about coming and giving a tango demo?
I'd love to learn how!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Night & ♥'s to all
Kindness is free!
JC Garrett: *Sneaking FISA Through the Back Door
Scary stuff.
Bill Quigley: War Resistance Arrests Rise Over 15,000 arrests have occurred in war resistance actions since 2002, many more and in many more places than traditional media report.
by people who are used to the paternalistic role--the strict parent or the mild parent.
Both are, at base, committed to authoritarian, rather than egalitarian, principles.
When Republicans launch into their "family values" spiel, they need to be hauled up short and asked to explain what they mean.
Paternalistic government is a problem because the preferred model is the traditional one where the men do the hard work of making decisions and giving orders--and occasionally fighting. Have you ever wondered how it happens that subsistance farmers can afford to launch military raids against neighboring states? It's because the real work of providing food, shelter and clothing is performed by the women.
The Rockefeller Foundation, in touting its program of agricultural assistance to Africa clearly expects this pattern to continue. Artificial fertilizers have to be introduced because the women are already so busy they don't have time or energy to do crop rotation and "green manure" applications. Keeping the men fighting actually helps to promote "economic development"--making the population dependent on purchasing goods and services, rather than providing for their own sustenance.
I can't find anything BO might have said in the past few days about FISA. If someone has something, anything indicating that he cares about this issue, please post it.
is another good dem who was ignored for the peppier horse race.
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/external_organizing/gG5hPr/commentary
| By Scott Goodstein - Jun 19th, 2008 at 10:45 pm EDT |
We are excited to announce the third print in our Artists for Obama Gallery at Store.BarackObama.com.
This print was created by award-winning engraver and critically acclaimed artist Antar Dayal. Dayal stated:
"I am honored to support Barack Obama's history-making presidential bid through one of his many visionary platforms, including recognizing the importance of art in America. My artwork is inspired by his words, wisdom, accomplishments, and expression of our hopes and dreams for a better America. Our world is facing seemingly insurmountable economic and environmental challenges.
As a first generation immigrant, I have confidence that America can collectively overcome these challenges under Obama's presidency. YES WE CAN!"
...
My laptop is acting up, so I may have a problem getting links of interest. LOL
Besides, I don't have a tool bar.
Where are all you "proud Democrats" as your party votes to throw more billions of your grandkids' money down the Iraq rat hole, and votes to give telecoms immunity, not only retroactive, but from now on.
they're complicit with the Bush Bownshirts, which makes them criminals too.
Sheeple..................
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/88783/?ses=c97aeb740513fc24b94e7c5d8fcf2107
The delirium in the press at Tim Russert's passing has been strange. As a broadcaster he was not much better than average, which is saying very little. He could be a sharp questioner, but not when it really counted and when courage was required. He was tough with George Bush in a February 2004 interview. He taxed him with faking the reasons to attack Iraq. But in the years before the 2003 attack, I used to hear Russert being merciless to those questioning whether Saddam Hussein had the nukes and bioweapons alleged by the Bush Administration and its co-conspirators in the press, prominent among them Russert himself.
Russert and his staff ignored efforts by watchdogs like Sam Husseini and others to get him to stop telling lies to the effect that it was Saddam who threw out the UNSCOM weapons inspectors, whereas it was Richard Butler, the head of UNSCOM, who pulled out the inspectors, apparently at the instigation of the United States. As Husseini correctly writes, "This lie, echoed through much of the political-media system around the time Russert told it, helped set the stage for the invasion after 9/11."
If Russert had rocked the boat in any serious way he'd have had more enemies. The right-wingers didn't care for Walter Cronkite, but they had no problem with Russert. Rush Limbaugh nuzzled him respectfully on the air, and so did Don Imus. Russert was always there with his watering can to fertilize myths useful to the system. On Russert's memorial show Ronald Reagan glowed in memory, up there with FDR as the twentieth century's best-loved and most popular American President. Not true at all, as Russert -- trained to read polls by years of working for Mario Cuomo and Daniel Patrick Moynihan -- could have found out in five minutes if he'd wanted to. Reagan had a scrawny 52 percent average approval rating for his presidency, worse than JFK, LBJ, Eisenhower, Roosevelt and Johnson. His supposed "likability" was also hugely exaggerated. But the invention of RR as the toast of the ordinary folk was necessary to validate the disgusting pigout for the very rich he inaugurated, which continues to this day.
Similarly necessary has been the notion that if it means winning the "war on terror," ordinary Americans are OK with the President (along with the US Congress) making a bonfire of the Constitution. and the Bill of Rights. Russert helped spread that lie too, even though polls dissected in numerous accounts by press watchdogs like FAIR have shown that a narrow majority of Americans hold contrary views on the matter.
Russert spent many years working for Moynihan, who played the greasiest cards in the political deck, whoring for the Israel lobby, race-baiting for Nixon. Few were more zealous than Russert in shredding anyone with the temerity to criticize Israel. Obama, now shuffling Moynihan's greasy deck with his Father's Day sermon about black responsibility, got a dose of Russert's own race-baiting earlier this year, with a ridiculous volley of questions about Farrakhan and Wright in the February 26 debate. Any white telly pundit can make hay with Farrakhan, but when it came to high gasoline prices Russert was meek as a shoeshine boy on his show, lining up the oil execs and tugging his forelock.
After Russert's death the TV played over and over the clip of his interview with Dick Cheney, where the latter said US troops will be greeted as liberators. Russert didn't say, "What do you mean, Mr. VP? People historically despise occupying armies. Bombing historically does not win people to your side." It was a softball moment for Cheney. Russert was part of the amen chorus.
Now, after his death, in congratulating Russert, his eulogists in the press get to congratulate themselves. On Hardball, Chris Matthews decided to have a show much like the one he always has, stacked with Irish Catholic men. This time it was more self-conscious, but the self-consciousness of it only underscored the incredible skewed reality that the show presents day in and day out.
Click/sign/send - damn it!
This is a timely foil to Sen 'Cain's recent distraction relating to a publicly financed general election and Sen Obama.
Help 'Cain answer the Court. Give him the platform to anwer
Sign Our Petition
Senator Obama's campaign and the DNC have unilaterally rejected lobbyist and special interest money, John McCain's campaign is blatantly breaking campaign finance law to raise as much of it as he can. Add your name to the growing list of others joining in support of our FEC lawsuit against John McCain's gaming of the public financing system.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080620/ap_on_el_pr/obama_strategy_5
With money, Obama to try to widen the battleground
By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer
23 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Barack Obama faced two critical questions: where to play and how to pay. To answer both, the Democrat reversed course to become the first candidate to reject $85 million in public money for the general election.
The decision will allow the record-shattering fundraiser to raise and spend as much as he wants — and, thus, implement his strategy to expand the Electoral College playing field.
Shortly after announcing that he would rely on his vast network of private donors, Obama launched a bold new advertising campaign that signaled a desire to compete in a mix of traditional battleground states and Republican strongholds while trying to win over independents and disaffected Republicans after eight years of President Bush.
"America is a country of strong families and strong values. My life's been blessed by both," Obama says in the ad slated to run in 18 states. "If I have the honor of taking the oath of office as president, it will be with a deep and abiding faith in the country I love."
...
Private financing of campaigns is wrong. Just becaise you can raise more money than the other guy is not a reason to throw away public financing. This was wrong now, it was wrong when Howard did it in the primaries in 2004.
The idea that "yeah, but our campaign contributions are 'purer' than the GOP's campaign contributions" is crap. Money speaks. If that's not true, why is Obama sucking up to Hillary's big bundlers? And he has his share of big bundlers too. They'll get a listen in an Obama White House, you and your $100 won't.
Public financing is the only answer which makes the voters, not the campaign contributors, the most important people to politicians.
Don't let your support of a candidate blind you to their mistakes and weaknesses and spin.
- An election is a public function--i.e. the public acts.
By Monica Smith on Jun 20, 2008 8:55 AM EDTHow to collect the pot of money that pays for the effort and who dispenses it fairly is a matter of choice. Regardless, the public is doing the funding. The question at this point would seem to be who plays the middleman part and can they be counted on to do it fairly. It seems to be Obama's judgement that the individuals currently in charge are not to be trusted. Since McCain has already corrupted the process by using money he didn't have to guarantee an uncollateralized loan for the primary and hasn't been penalized for it, that judgement strikes me as well-founded.
That's one way of looking at it, on the other hand, if Barack took public financing, the rethugs would be assured of the WH for at least the next four years. Kerry found that out the hard way.
"Public financing is the only answer which makes the voters, not the campaign contributors, the most important people to politicians."
Based on this premise, it is safe to assume that you find McCain to be the candidate less beholden to special interests because he will be accepting public funds in the general election.
... looks like the joke is on the American people:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-alterman20-2008jun20,0,3361955.story

June 20, 2008
But even though we might be taken with McCain personally, we like to think we would resist the urge to offer the sort of spontaneous testimonials to his character that have gushed from the pens of so many journalists. These would include calling McCain "a cool dude" (Jake Tapper, Salon); "an original, imaginative and at times inspiring candidate" (Jacob Weisberg, Slate); "the bravest candidate in the presidential race" (Dana Milbank, the Washington Post); "an affable man of zealous, unbending beliefs" and "the hero [who] still does things his own way" (Richard Cohen, the Washington Post). We certainly hope that we would not say, as Charles Lane did, writing in the Oct. 18, 1999, issue of the New Republic: "I know it shouldn't be happening, but it is. I'm falling for John McCain."
Believe us, we could go on (and on and on). But suffice it to say that no candidate since John F. Kennedy, and perhaps none since Franklin Delano Roosevelt, has enjoyed such cozy relations with the media.
Of course, there is no law against a journalist falling in love with a politician. There's also no question that before the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. became the most famous man in America, coverage of Sen. Barack Obama was also extremely favorable. And it's true that McCain's easy ride has hit speed bumps in recent weeks.
But years of devotion are not likely to be erased overnight, even in the event of an unlikely U-turn on the part of mainstream journalists. The reality is that McCain has enjoyed a degree of indulgence over the years that has made it almost impossible for most Americans to understand the kind of presidency he now proposes.
This is partly quantifiable. Consider this, for instance: During the nine-year period from 1997 to 2005, no one was invited onto the Sunday morning network shows more than McCain, who appeared 124 times, according to Media Matters, the progressive media monitoring group -- over 50% more than his closest competitor. What's more, he was accorded 86 solo interviews, also more than anyone else.
McCain's legendary diversionary walks from the path of the Republican straight-and-narrow so impressed his friends in the media that they appear to have passed a secret law among themselves never to refer to the senior Arizona senator without using the word "maverick." As David Brock and Paul Waldman demonstrated in their book "Free Ride," the words "maverick" and "McCain" appeared within 10 words of each other 2,114 times in 2000 -- a pace that also has been reflected in McCain's 2008 coverage.
What's the effect of all these years of loving treatment at the hands of the media? On issue after issue, and from every side of the journalistic political spectrum, a campaign of distortion has helped to ensure that the real John McCain -- and his extreme conservative positions and politically inspired flip-flops -- remain far from the consciousness of the average voter.
According to an extensive Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll taken in early May, for instance, only 27% of voters have positive views of the Republican Party. A clear majority of voters in the same survey said they wished for a Democratic president. And yet, in what the Journal reporters termed a "remarkable" finding, McCain remained in a dead heat with Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton in head-to-head matchups. The authors' explanation: "McCain's image is trumping negatives such as the war and the economy."
In a Pew Research Center survey from May, most voters described McCain as "a centrist whose views are fairly close to their own."
These voters might as well be visiting Casablanca for the waters. The reality is that McCain has repudiated virtually all of the moderate, supposedly maverick positions that liberal reporters and columnists used to find so admirable. He voted for President Bush's right to waterboarding; he now rejects his own immigration plan; he hopes to extend the tax cuts he once condemned; and he's fine with Bush's plan for domestic spying.
Today, McCain calls himself a thorough-going conservative, and he's got the statistics to prove it. He has voted with his party almost 90% of the time this term
...is different from the John McCain of 2000. Which is the real McCain? Are they both real, just dealing with different situations? I know one thing. In 2000, McCain made fun of the people who acted like he has this campaign -- those who get "Potomac Fever" and will say and do anything to be President. He's reached that point, and it's disappointing.
That being said -- if Obama wants better press relations, open up some more. He's bought into the "restrict access and control the message" meme of the Democratic consultant class. For all the weaknesses of the MSM, they are the transfer agent for information for most of the country who will be voting this November. Open access, in the long run, buys better coverage, even if it means giving up some control.
- Q: the only real thing in that photo of Bush and his media harem ?
By * rdorgan on Jun 20, 2008 8:04 AM EDTA: the can of Coca Cola
John McCain is a petty dictator. Period. Let him prove otherwise. Starting sentences with a reference to the Democratic candidate doesn't count. It merely creates the impression that John McCain is attentive to other people.
Indeed, it's really nothing more than a figure of speech, akin to "some people say."
And has about as much relevance to Obama's actual positions or statements.
Refuting the particulars strikes me as a waste of time.
What the McCain candidacy should demonstrate is that Bush Two was not unique. There
are lots more like him out there.
http://www.wickedlocal.com/sudbury/news/x415941776/Young-inventor-wants-your-vote

Ethan Minkoff, 6, with the "Windshiled Wiper Goalie" the invention that is a finalist in a contest for young sports-loving
- <script type="text/javascript"></script>
Young inventor wants your vote
By Carole LaMond/Staff Writer
Fri Jun 20, 2008, 06:42 AM EDT
A love of sports, and a lot of ingenuity, has resulted in the invention of a sports accessory that could win a little Sudbury boy a big prize.
Ethan Minkoff, 6, is one of five finalists in the By Kids For Kids "Sports Evolution Challenge" for his invention the "Windshield Wiper Goalie." Minkoff is in the running for a $10,000 Grand Prize as well as a trip to meet an ESPN sportscaster/announcer.
The next phase of the judging is online voting. Anyone can visit the Web site (www.bkfk.com) to view his entry and vote from June 20 – July 4. The online voting is factored into the final results in determining the grand prize winner.
"It’s my first one," said Minkoff of his invention. "I like it."
Minkoff likes sports - a lot.
Baseball, soccer, hockey and basketball are among his favorite sports, and his backyard is full of miniature sports equipment for perfecting his athletic skills.
The first thing the Nixon Elementary School kindergartener does every morning is watch Sports Desk and read the sports section of the newspaper. He’s a huge Red Sox fan whose favorite player is Jacoby Ellsbury. He’s been to four games this year including the May 31 game at Camden Yards in Baltimore where he saw Manny Ramirez hit his 500th career home run.
So when his grandma and grandpa, Eli and Nancy Minkoff of Natick, told him about a contest for young inventors who love sports, Minkoff was very interested. The contest challenged kids to come up with an invention to solve a practical need as well as improve a player’s skill.
...
"It took me a while," said Minkoff of the inventing process.
Minkoff and his dad, Neil, started tossing ideas around.
"We thought of a lot of ideas," said Minkoff. "One was a bat with balls inside, and the funniest was a soccer ball with springs. We thought it would be goofy."
Minkoff especially likes to practice shooting hockey and soccer goals, but his mom, Joyce, is often too busy chasing baby sister Lily, 2, to be a reliable goalie.
That got him thinking about how to make a goalie invention.
"We worked hard together," said Minkoff. "This was the best."
He and his dad came up with the "Windshield Wiper Goalie." They started with a piece of cardboard, decided what size it should be, and attached it to the goal frame with a metal hanger.
"Ah, this is the invention," Minkoff thought when they were done. He then kicked some balls into the goal-stopper "and it worked."
"My best friend loves the Revolution," so Minkoff pasted Revolution soccer logos on one piece of cardboard. He made a second cardboard goalie and decorated it with Bruins logos.
The design specs Minkoff and his dad made for the contest show a foam pad on a metal bar designed to attach to the crossbar of a soccer or hockey goal and swing like a pendulum or a windshield wiper. This will make drills and practices more realistic while enabling the athlete to practice hand-eye coordination and improve accuracy for certain sports.
Joyce Minkoff sent in the entry by the March 31 deadline, and in May Ethan received a call that his invention was one of the finalists in the age 5 - 19 category.
...
By Kids for Kids runs four quarterly competitions, where kids can enter their inventions to win cash prizes, a chance to meet famous innovators and have their idea transformed into a commercial product. Its mission is to inspire, motivate and stimulate the innovative spirit within all young people.
Cast your vote for Ethan Minkoff’s "Windshield Wiper Goalie" at www.bkfk.com from June 20 – July 4.
...
These contests are the latest strategy to get email lists from people with known preferences and local connections. That kind of information makes them a useful marketing tool.
- Obama's campaign finance decision was a statement of winning the internal fight with the DLC.
By Phil Specht on Jun 20, 2008 8:23 AM EDTThe whole idea of the DLC was predicated on sucking up to corporate interests and K street to compete on funding with the Republicans. the grassroots won
maybe the perfect would be the enemy of the good to accept public financing because the only way the grassroots can demonstrate it is really and finally in charge of the party is to finance a winning campaign
...from the big bundlers, I'll believe that. But he hasn't, and he won't. That means these are the people who will have access, not the $100 contributor.
I agree. Mom and Pop's agenda won't have a chance against big coal, big nukes and big Pharma, to name only 3
rich -
That's an opinion of yours that I don't share.
I will continue to contribute to the Obama '08.
Yes WE Can includes me.
the proof will be in the details of Democratic legislation that he signals he would be unwilling to sign without changes
- Democratic Criminals join Republican Brownshirts in shredding the Constitution
By Huron John on Jun 20, 2008 8:40 AM EDThttp://www.opednews.com/articles/Duopoly-Expands-Spy-Powers-by-Rady-Ananda-080619-48.html
Our corporate-sponsored Congress further shreds the Bill of Rights by expanding the government's power to spy on us, and grants immunity to the phone companies that have been criminally cooperating with BushCo's illegal domestic spying program over the past several years. In a vote expected shortly, the FISA protections of the past 30 years will be gutted.
Support Cindy Sheehan's campaign against Pelosi!
...Pelosi is a whore and a traitor for supporting the FISA bill -- she's covering her own derriere and Rockefeller's.
http://thestrangebedfellows.com/
... out of the country:
McCain to tout NAFTA during Canadian visit
Updated Fri. Jun. 20 2008 8:43 AM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
U.S. Senator John McCain will be in Canada Friday, taking a detour from his presidential bid and bolstering his support for the North American Free Trade Agreement.
The presumptive Republican nominee for president is also expected to meet with government and military officials, and he is slated to give a speech before the influential Economic Club of Canada in Ottawa.
Former American ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci says McCain will likely emphasize the importance of Canada's economic relationship with the U.S. and Mexico.
McCain is expected to highlight themes he has spoken about on the presidential campaign trail, where he has consistently criticized Barack Obama, his Democratic rival, for statements he made criticizing aspects of NAFTA.
"(McCain is) going to talk about how free trade creates more and better jobs, how it keeps interest rates down, how it keeps inflation down, how it keeps lower prices for consumers in the United States, as well as in Canada," said Cellucci, who served in Ottawa under President George Bush.
...
IMO, ex repub Massachusetts Governor Paul Cellucci is not fondly remembered by anybody in MA -- whether dem, repub or indy.
he's in Japan and getting coverage from Reuters.
New thread.
Protestors Ask CalPERS To Divest In Iraq
Pension Fund Invested Millions In War Contractor
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Protestors said Thursday they want the California Public Employees Retirement System to divest from the war in Iraq. ...more: http://www.kcra.com/news/16658792/detail.html
----
related stories
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)Post closed to commenting
| My DFA | |
| Members | |
| Groups | |
| Events | |
| Candidates | |
![]() |
|
Blog for America
-
Fascinating Video: John McCain's Former Fellow P.O.W.
By Mara on Sep 6, 2008 1:16 PM EDT -
Sunday stops from Gerry
By Gerry L on Sep 7, 2008 8:15 AM EDT -
Change for the sake of change and why that is a good thing
By Thomas Janowski on Sep 6, 2008 9:03 AM EDT -
Stephen Views the News 9/6/08
By Stephen Weinstein on Sep 6, 2008 7:55 AM EDT -
Saturday's article scan from Gerry
By Gerry L on Sep 6, 2008 8:58 AM EDT
Recommended Blog Posts
-
Yes the surge worked BUT What it did was
By Anomalous Biff on Sep 1, 2008 6:32 PM EDT -
Online Auction Fundraiser
By Ellen Garneau on Sep 2, 2008 9:48 AM EDT -
The moral and intelligent might boycott this election, these parties
By Anomalous Biff on Sep 1, 2008 9:32 AM EDT -
Can the Heart Tuner "Gizmo" Locate Your Soul?
By Subway Serenade on Aug 30, 2008 11:18 AM EDT









-
By Jessica Falker on Jun 19, 2008 1:03 PM EDTDeans are first!