Home » Users » REMOVED » Blog » 3 [Tarrant County, TX] precincts...
Democracy for America personal blog for REMOVED
3 [Tarrant County, TX] precincts' caucus votes won't count
Linked to groups: Democracy for Texas
3 [Tarrant County, TX] precincts' caucus votes won't count By AMAN BATHEJA Star-Telegram Staff Writer Posted on Sat, Mar. 08, 2008 http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/518514.html Hundreds of people were crammed into the tiny cafeteria at Atherton Elementary School in Arlington on Tuesday night. They waited there, shoulder to shoulder, at precinct caucuses for more than two hours to declare their support for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama for president. People who attended said the mood grew heated as participants lost confidence in whether their votes would be counted. They had every reason to worry. The Tarrant County Democratic Party confirmed Friday that it had received envelopes with blank forms for all three precinct caucuses at the school. "At this point, we don't have any record that anything happened there," said Keith Annis, the county party's executive director.
No sign-in sheets The Arlington school served three precincts: 2027, 2235, and 2461. At 6:30 p.m., people started gathering for the caucuses in the school's cafeteria. Around 7:30 p.m., the last person in line voted in the primaries, and the caucuses were ready to begin, said Keith Andrews, who had spent the entire day outside the school campaigning for Clinton. Andrews had attended a precinct training set up by the Clinton campaign. He had also studied the rules of precinct caucuses. After learning that there was no precinct caucus chairman, Andrews volunteered. "I knew from the training that any qualified voter at that point can take the packets and be the temporary chair," Andrews said. Andrews' job was to have everyone from his precinct enter their names and candidate preferences on sign-in sheets. Two other people agreed to be chairmen for the other two precinct caucuses. "It was a massive crowd, so we were shouting over all the noise and everything to try and tell people where to split into groups," Andrews said. The three chairmen opened up their packets to find there were no sign-in sheets inside. Calling the campaigns None of them knew what to do. Andrews didn't have a number for the local party. He did have one for the local Clinton campaign office. A lawyer there told him someone would be there with sign-in sheets within an hour. Andrews jumped onto a cafeteria table and told the crowd the situation. Many were unhappy to learn that the Clinton campaign had gotten involved, he said. "The crowd was highly agitated and it was being focused on me because I was the only one speaking," Andrews said. Soon, Andrews said, someone thrust a cellphone in his face. A man who said he was a lawyer with the Obama campaign told Andrews that any piece of paper filled out properly could be accepted as a legally binding sign-in sheet. Andrews got back up on the table to tell everyone the good news. To his surprise, the crowd didn't like the sound of that either. Apparently anyone associated with either campaign was viewed as untrustworthy. "I decided at that point I was poison to these people so I stepped down," Andrews said. Just before 9 p.m., with the crowd still fumbling toward a solution, Andrews left before his precinct caucus began. He said he was worried for his safety. "I just didn't need someone taking out their frustration out on me," he said. 'No convention' Clarence Christopher had waited more than two hours in the Atherton Elementary cafeteria. He and his wife, both lifelong Democrats, didn't understand what was causing the delay. All they knew was that the people in charge didn't seem to know what they were doing. "It was just the most disorganized thing I've ever seen," Christopher said. Around 9 p.m., after Andrews and dozens of others had left, someone told everyone in the room to line up by precinct. "They got a piece of notebook paper and you walked by there and you told them who you voted for and what precinct," Christopher said. He noticed that the people running his precinct caucus weren't taking down names, just presidential preferences. The Christophers, who said they had read about what to expect from the caucus, said they left the school thinking the results would not be accepted. Annis said those pieces of notebook paper would likely have been ruled ineligible even if they had been submitted. Packets for precincts 2027, 2235, and 2461 were dropped off at the Tarrant County Democratic Party headquarters in Fort Worth this week. None of them had sign-in sheets. The volunteers processing the packets followed their instructions and wrote "NO CONVENTION" in marker on each envelope. Dozens of complaints The local Democratic Party has received 568 caucus packets out of 638 precincts in the county, Annis said, but has not processed them all. He said he was not aware of any other precincts that had caucuses without a proper record. Annis did say he had received dozens of complaints about local caucuses. Voters in any precinct have the right to challenge the results of their precinct caucuses. A credentials committee is being set up for each Senate district, he said. The committees will soon meet to hear voter complaints. Andrews said he plans to pursue a complaint. He said the process would have run smoothly had he been given the right materials. "I felt like with the training I had gotten, had I gotten those sign-in sheets, I could have gotten their votes counted," Andrews said.
http://www.ethics.state.tx.us/forms/cfcp...
Texas Ethics Commission
CODE OF FAIR CAMPAIGN PRACTICES
There are basic principles of decency, honesty, and fair play that every candidate and political committee in this state has a moral obligation to observe and uphold, in order that, after vigorously contested but fairly conducted campaigns, our citizens may exercise their constitutional rights to a free and untrammeled choice and the will of the people may be fully and clearly expressed on the issues.
THEREFORE:
(1) I will conduct the campaign openly and publicly and limit attacks on my opponent to legitimate challenges to my opponent.s record and stated positions on issues.
(2) I will not use or permit the use of character defamation, whispering campaigns, libel, slander, or scurrilous attacks on any candidate or the candidate.s personal or family life.
(3) I will not use or permit any appeal to negative prejudice based on race, sex, religion, or national origin.
(4) I will not use campaign material of any sort that misrepresents, distorts, or otherwise falsifies the facts, nor will I use malicious or unfounded accusations that aim at creating or exploiting doubts, without justification, as to the personal integrity or patriotism of my opponent.
(5) I will not undertake or condone any dishonest or unethical practice that tends to corrupt or undermine our system of free elections or that hampers or prevents the full and free expression of the will of the voters, including any activity aimed at intimidating voters or discouraging them from voting.
(6) I will defend and uphold the right of every qualified voter to full and equal participation in the electoral process, and will not engage in any activity aimed at intimidating voters or discouraging them from voting.
(7) I will immediately and publicly repudiate methods and tactics that may come from others that I have pledged not to use or condone. I shall take firm action against any subordinate who violates any provision of this code or the laws governing elections.
I, the undersigned, candidate for election to public office in the State of Texas or campaign treasurer of a political committee, hereby voluntarily endorse, subscribe to, and solemnly pledge myself to conduct the campaign in accordance with the above principles and practices.
______________________
Date
______________________
Signature
http://www.softwaresecure.com/pdf/Cheati...
What Makes People Cheat?
Cheaters seem to be everywhere these days -- in sports, in corporate boardrooms, and in the highest levels of government. ...
...cheating has a real and corrosive effect on society. Society is premised on people accepting and obeying the rules. Why do we stop at a stoplight on a desolate road in the middle of the night? Or why don't we steal a pack of gum when we know that the cashier isn't looking? Part of it may come from the fear that we're secretly being watched. But another reason is that most of us have agreed to be bound by the rules of our society. Cheating breaks those rules, and the effects can be far-reaching.
"Cheating is harmful because is betrays your responsibility to the community," says McCabe. "It can make community standards fall apart."
Imagine being treated by a doctor who never took an exam in medical school without a cheat sheet? Or What Makes People Cheat? - Trustworthy, Physician finding out that your home team only won because they had the most effective doping regimen? We all rely on the fact that people -- like doctors and athletes -- are what they seem, that they're qualified and have earned their position.
Although there's little firm evidence, some experts think that cheating in one part of your life may lead to cheating in others. "People who cut corners early in life -- such as cheating a lot in school -- may bring that habit to the workplace," says Callahan.
Cheating also forces you to lie to yourself. Callahan says that many cheaters develop rationalizations for why they cheat.
We say we lie on our taxes because we think tax rates are too high. We say we're cheating in school not because we couldn't do the assignment on our own but because it's much faster to copy. We say we have an illegal cable hook-up because we're protesting the monopoly of the local cable company. The more excuses you need to justify your behavior, the more compromised your ethical compass. You may ultimately wind up feeling like a fraud, unworthy of the things you have.
...Combating systemic cheating in our society requires some dramatic changes, experts say. McCabe strongly suggests that colleges adopt formal honor codes in order to fight cheating in school. Callahan argues that we need to create a more equitable society where the opportunities for the rich and the poor are not so starkly different.
On an individual level, McCabe argues that you should examine your own actions. Remember that there are more important things than getting ahead or having a perfect GPA.
"If you get a B while everyone else got an A because they were cheating, that's a good B to have," says McCabe.
Callahan agrees that we need to put less stress on individual achievements and relax a little. "Parents can recognize that life is not a linear set of accomplishments," says Callahan. "People can find their way, and a kid doesn't need to jump through every hoop perfectly in order to lead a secure life."
Many people feel pushed into cheating because everyone else is doing it -- they don't want to be the lone chump who does things honestly. But if you're in that position, Callahan has some interesting advice:
Take a stand and be a chump. You may feel better about yourself if you do.
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)Post closed to commenting
| My DFA | |
| Members | |
| Groups | |
| Events | |
| Candidates | |
![]() |
|
Blog for America
-
The True Meaning of the Holiday Season
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 22, 2008 8:33 AM EST -
What would the MN recount be like?
By Dave Santucci on Nov 20, 2008 6:57 PM EST -
Reuters: Cheney and Gonzales Indicted
By Kevin Shaw on Nov 19, 2008 6:21 AM EST -
Unhappy Birthday Senator Stevens
By Dave Santucci on Nov 18, 2008 9:45 AM EST -
Happy Birthday Howard!
By Dave Santucci on Nov 17, 2008 9:56 AM EST
Recent Blog Posts
-
Inspired by Obama's Actions as President-Elect
By Connie Amidei on Nov 23, 2008 11:19 AM EST -
BBC's Take On US Auto Industry
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 23, 2008 9:40 AM EST -
what caught my eye this Sunday...
By Gerry L on Nov 23, 2008 9:09 AM EST -
Progressives Must Demand CHANGE
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 22, 2008 8:56 PM EST -
Stephen Views the News 11/22/08
By Stephen Weinstein on Nov 22, 2008 12:23 PM EST






-
By Susan Rowe on Mar 9, 2008 10:35 AM EDTDid Republicans Give Hillary Her Victory in Ohio?
by By Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
March 8, 2008
Hilary Clinton's larger-than-expected victory in Ohio may have been won with votes from Republicans, and from independents who usually vote Republican.
Much has been made of Rush Limbaugh’s other far-right commentators’ pleas to Republicans to cast their ballots for her in open primary states like Ohio and Texas. Part of the strategy is to slow down Barack Obama, who analysts argue will be harder for John McCain to beat this fall. Others, like Ann Coulter, have gone so far as to say they actually PREFER Clinton to McCain. Such voters would certainly also prefer the former first lady to Obama. ...full article: http://www.freepress.org/departments/dis...
---
Texas caucus hardball
The Dallas Morning News gets hold of Clinton caucus "training materials," in which supporters are instructed to fight for procedural control of caucuses.
The materials say in part, "DO NOT allow the supporter of another candidate to serve in leadership roles."
It goes on to say, "If our supporters are outnumbered, ask the Temporary Chair if one of our supporters can serve as the Secretary, in the interest of fairness.
"The control of the sign-in sheets and the announcement of the delegates allotted to each candidate are the critical functions of the Chair and Secretary. This is why it is so important that Hillary supporters hold these positions."
full post: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0...